GOLF COURSE ESTATE v. RUKERIKIBAYE

GOLF COURSE ESTATE v. RUKERIKIBAYE

The Supreme Court held that the arbitrators did not exceed their mandate because the parties' submissions and the terms of reference contemplated the possibility of lease termination and its consequences. Both parties' claims implied or required a determination on whether the lease should continue or be terminated. Therefore, the arbitral award was within the scope of the arbitrators' authority, and the appeal had no merit.

Citation
RCOMAA 0041/11/CS
Parties
Applicant: Golf Course Estate Ltd; Respondent: Rukerikibaye Raphaël
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
3 August 2012
Case Number
RCOMAA 0041/11/CS
Procedural Posture
Commercial Arbitration Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; lower court decision affirmed.
Legal Topics
Lease Termination, Scope of Arbitral Authority, Appeal From Arbitral Award, Contractual Remedies
Source Language
en, rw
Arbitration Commercial Law Contract Law Lease Termination Scope of Arbitral Authority Appeal From Arbitral Award Contractual Remedies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Golf Course Estate Ltd

Applicant

Rukerikibaye Raphaël

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Arbitration Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the arbitrators exceeded their mandate by terminating the lease agreement
  2. 2 Whether the arbitral award was based on issues not submitted by the parties

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the arbitrators did not exceed their mandate because the parties' submissions and the terms of reference contemplated the possibility of lease termination and its consequences. Both parties' claims implied or required a determination on whether the lease should continue or be terminated. Therefore, the arbitral award was within the scope of the arbitrators' authority, and the appeal had no merit.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; lower court decision affirmed.

Orders

  • Rukerikibaye Raphaël to pay court costs of 42,450 FRW