Re. KABASINGA
Article 133(5) of Law Nº 68/2018 is inconsistent with articles 29 and 151 of the Constitution because it imposes a mandatory life sentence without allowing consideration of mitigating circumstances, thereby violating the right to due process and the independence of the judiciary in sentencing.
- Citation
- RLR V.2-2020
- Parties
- Petitioner: Kabasinga Florida; Respondent: Government of Rwanda
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 4 December 2019
- Case Number
- RS/INCONST/SPEC 00003/2019/SC
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed
- Legal Topics
- Due Process, Judicial Independence, Mandatory Sentencing, Sentencing Discretion, Child Defilement, Mitigating Circumstances
- Source Language
- en
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kabasinga Florida
Petitioner
Government of Rwanda
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether article 133, paragraph five of Law Nº 68/2018, which imposes a mandatory life sentence for child defilement followed by cohabitation as husband and wife, is inconsistent with articles 29 and 151 of the Constitution of Rwanda regarding due process and judicial independence.
Ratio Decidendi
Article 133(5) of Law Nº 68/2018 is inconsistent with articles 29 and 151 of the Constitution because it imposes a mandatory life sentence without allowing consideration of mitigating circumstances, thereby violating the right to due process and the independence of the judiciary in sentencing.
Court Disposition
petition allowed
Orders
- Article 133, paragraph five of Law Nº 68/2018 is declared inconsistent with articles 29 and 151 of the Constitution and is without effect.
- This judgment shall be published in the Official Gazette of the Government.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment