GUKORA NI NGOMBWA LTD v DUSHIMIMANA

GUKORA NI NGOMBWA LTD v DUSHIMIMANA

The appellate court held that urgent applications are provisional and not subject to res judicata; the caveat was not compliant with the applicable law as it was not based on a confirmed debt or court order, and Dushimimana had provided sufficient security. The High Court did not err in removing the caveat, and no...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCA 00001/2022/CA
Parties
Appellant: Gukora Ni Ngombwa Ltd; Respondent: Dushimimana Jacqueline
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
11 February 2022
Case Number
RCA 00001/2022/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (urgent Application) / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Provisional Measures, Land Registration, Caveat, Urgent Applications, Authority of Res Judicata, Execution of Judgments
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Property Law Provisional Measures Land Registration Caveat Urgent Applications Authority of Res Judicata Execution of Judgments

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Gukora Ni Ngombwa Ltd

Appellant

Dushimimana Jacqueline

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (urgent Application) / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the High Court erred in removing the caveat on Dushimimana's immovable property
  2. 2 Whether the High Court relied on an inapplicable law when removing the caveat
  3. 3 Whether the High Court disregarded the authority of a prior judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The appellate court held that urgent applications are provisional and not subject to res judicata; the caveat was not compliant with the applicable law as it was not based on a confirmed debt or court order, and Dushimimana had provided sufficient security. The High Court did not err in removing the caveat, and no prejudice to the main proceedings was shown.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No change to the High Court's decision removing the caveat on Dushimimana's property.
  • Gukora Ni Ngombwa Ltd to pay Dushimimana Jacqueline 500,000 Frw as attorney fees and 300,000 Frw as litigation costs.