UBUSHINJACYAHA v HABIMANA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v HABIMANA

The Court of Appeal found that the High Court/Musanze Chamber did not sufficiently mitigate the sentence, given that the defendant was a first-time offender, was 22 years old at the time, and the victim was 17 years old. The sentence was reduced to 13 years' imprisonment, considering these mitigating factors and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 01149/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Habimana Jean Damascène
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
20 August 2025
Case Number
RPAA 01149/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Appeals, Sexual Offences, Mitigating Circumstances
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Sentencing Appeals Sexual Offences Mitigating Circumstances

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Habimana Jean Damascène

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed by the High Court/Musanze Chamber was sufficiently mitigated given the circumstances of the case.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that the High Court/Musanze Chamber did not sufficiently mitigate the sentence, given that the defendant was a first-time offender, was 22 years old at the time, and the victim was 17 years old. The sentence was reduced to 13 years' imprisonment, considering these mitigating factors and comparative case law.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed to the extent of sentence reduction.
  • The judgment of the High Court/Musanze Chamber dated 16/10/2024 is modified only as to sentence.