UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. HABINEZA OBED

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. HABINEZA OBED

The Court of Appeal found that Habineza Obed committed the offense at age twenty, just out of childhood, and was a first-time offender. These mitigating factors, combined with statutory provisions, justified further reduction of his sentence to ten years.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00292/2023/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Habineza Obed
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
29 November 2024
Case Number
RPAA 00292/2023/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Defilement, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Appeal
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Defilement Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Habineza Obed

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on Habineza Obed should be further reduced based on mitigating circumstances and relevant statutory provisions

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that Habineza Obed committed the offense at age twenty, just out of childhood, and was a first-time offender. These mitigating factors, combined with statutory provisions, justified further reduction of his sentence to ten years.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • The sentence imposed by the High Court is modified; Habineza Obed is sentenced to ten years imprisonment for defilement of a fifteen-year-old.
  • Court fees are borne by the State as Habineza Obed appealed while in custody.