HARERIMANA N’ABANDI v. SEBUKAYIRE

HARERIMANA N’ABANDI v. SEBUKAYIRE

The Supreme Court found that the plot rightfully belonged to Harerimana Gaspard and Mukangwije Thérèse, as evidenced by the 1988 purchase and corroborating testimonies. Sebukayire failed to prove legitimate acquisition or proper registration, and his certificate was annulled. However, since Sebukayire built on the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.3 - 2015
Parties
Applicant: Harerimana Emmanuel n'abandi (Harerimana Gaspard na Mukangwije Thérèse); Respondent: Sebukayire Tharcisse
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
24 December 2014
Case Number
RCAA 0018/13/CS
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; lower court decision reversed in full.
Legal Topics
Land Ownership, Land Registration, Compensation for Improvements, Procedural Law, Standing, Joinder of Parties
Source Language
rw
Land Law Civil Procedure Land Ownership Land Registration Compensation for Improvements Procedural Law Standing Joinder of Parties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Harerimana Emmanuel n'abandi (Harerimana Gaspard na Mukangwije Thérèse)

Applicant

Sebukayire Tharcisse

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment

  1. 1 Who is the rightful owner of the disputed land?
  2. 2 Was the land registration in favor of Sebukayire valid?
  3. 3 Are the applicants entitled to compensation and damages?

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court found that the plot rightfully belonged to Harerimana Gaspard and Mukangwije Thérèse, as evidenced by the 1988 purchase and corroborating testimonies. Sebukayire failed to prove legitimate acquisition or proper registration, and his certificate was annulled. However, since Sebukayire built on the land in good faith, he is entitled to compensation for the value of the buildings. The applicants are awarded litigation costs and attorney fees, but not moral damages, as Sebukayire acted without deceit.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; lower court decision reversed in full.

Orders

  • Plot No. 0672/GAS/KAC declared property of Harerimana Gaspard and Mukangwije Thérèse.
  • Land certificate in the name of Sebukayire Tharcisse and Umutoni Sarah annulled and to be re-registered to Harerimana Gaspard and Mukangwije Thérèse.