UBUSHINJACYAHA vs HARORIMANA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs HARORIMANA

The Court held that since the law had been amended, the minimum sentence for the offence is 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 Frw, and the court cannot reduce the sentence below this threshold, regardless of mitigating circumstances or previous case law decided under the old law.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA00364/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Harorimana Abel
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
21 January 2025
Case Number
RPAA00364/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.
Legal Topics
Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Application of Amended Law
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Trafficking Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances Application of Amended Law

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Harorimana Abel

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on Harorimana Abel could be further reduced below the statutory minimum after the amendment of the law

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that since the law had been amended, the minimum sentence for the offence is 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 Frw, and the court cannot reduce the sentence below this threshold, regardless of mitigating circumstances or previous case law decided under the old law.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed.

Orders

  • The appeal of Harorimana Abel is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The judgment of the High Court in case RPA 00090/2021/HC/KIG dated 10/05/2024 is upheld.