HITIYAREMYE N’ABANDI v. RADIANT INSURANCE COMPANY Ltd

HITIYAREMYE N’ABANDI v. RADIANT INSURANCE COMPANY Ltd

The applicants failed to prove that the insured (motorcycle driver) was at fault for the accident. The evidence, including the police report and witness statements, indicated that the deceased cyclist caused the accident by leaving his lane. Therefore, the insurer is not liable for compensation. The appeal is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCA00393/2023/HC/KIG
Parties
Applicant: Hitiyaremye Pascal, Barasenga Thérèse, Akimanizanye Jeannette, Turatsinze Venuste, Ndayishimiye Emmanuel, Twiringiyimana Xavier, Masengesho Zachée, Mukiza Jean D'amour, Uwikunda Benitha, Iranejeje Pascal, Iradukunda Kaliza Naome, Uwajeneza Queen, all represented by Mukandayisenga Josephine; Respondent: Radiant Insurance Company Ltd
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
10 January 2025
Case Number
RCA00393/2023/HC/KIG
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Motor Vehicle Accident Liability, Mandatory Insurance, Burden of Proof, Compensation for Death, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Insurance Law Tort Law Civil Procedure Motor Vehicle Accident Liability Mandatory Insurance Burden of Proof Compensation for Death Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hitiyaremye Pascal, Barasenga Thérèse, Akimanizanye Jeannette, Turatsinze Venuste, Ndayishimiye Emmanuel, Twiringiyimana Xavier, Masengesho Zachée, Mukiza Jean D'amour, Uwikunda Benitha, Iranejeje Pascal, Iradukunda Kaliza Naome, Uwajeneza Queen, all represented by Mukandayisenga Josephine

Applicant

Radiant Insurance Company Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the insured (motorcycle driver) was at fault for the accident causing death and thus whether the insurer is liable for compensation
  2. 2 Whether the lower court erred in not considering witness testimony and in relying solely on the police report
  3. 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to compensation from the insurer

Ratio Decidendi

The applicants failed to prove that the insured (motorcycle driver) was at fault for the accident. The evidence, including the police report and witness statements, indicated that the deceased cyclist caused the accident by leaving his lane. Therefore, the insurer is not liable for compensation. The appeal is dismissed and the applicants are ordered to pay costs and attorney fees to the respondent.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by Hitiyaremye Pascal and others is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The judgment of the Gasabo Intermediate Court in RC00496/2022/TGI/Gsbo dated 10/10/2023 is upheld in all respects.