HOME BASKET SACCO KIMIRONKO v. MWISENEZA N ABANDI

HOME BASKET SACCO KIMIRONKO v. MWISENEZA N ABANDI

The applicant failed to provide any concrete evidence of urgency or irreparable harm that would justify a stay of execution. Mere assertions without proof are insufficient. The lower court correctly refused the stay, and the appeal is dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMA 00001/2023/CA (
Parties
Appellant: HOME BASKET SACCO KIMIRONKO; Respondent: Mwiseneza Maurice; Respondent: Munyaneza Aimable; Respondent: Niringiyimana Béatrice
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
14 April 2023
Case Number
RCOMA 00001/2023/CA (
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Urgent Applications, Stay of Execution, New Evidence on Appeal, Liability for Debts, CRB Listing, Damages for Reputational Harm
Source Language
rw
Commercial Law Civil Procedure Urgent Applications Stay of Execution New Evidence on Appeal Liability for Debts CRB Listing Damages for Reputational Harm

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HOME BASKET SACCO KIMIRONKO

Appellant

Mwiseneza Maurice

Respondent

Munyaneza Aimable

Respondent

Niringiyimana Béatrice

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether urgent grounds existed to justify a stay of execution pending review on new evidence
  2. 2 Whether the lower court erred in refusing to stay execution
  3. 3 Whether the respondents were liable for the debt incurred by their father

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide any concrete evidence of urgency or irreparable harm that would justify a stay of execution. Mere assertions without proof are insufficient. The lower court correctly refused the stay, and the appeal is dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The decision of the High Commercial Court in RCOMA 00068/2023/HCC is upheld in all respects.
  • Costs incurred by HOME BASKET SACCO KIMIRONKO are to be borne by itself.