I&M BANK v. SEBULIKOKO_kn

I&M BANK v. SEBULIKOKO_kn

The Supreme Court held that the mortgage remained valid between the parties as long as the underlying debt was unpaid, regardless of whether the registration was renewed. The auction of the collateral by I&M Bank was lawful. The respondents' claim for compensation was rejected. The bank's claim for damages was also...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.1-2019
Parties
Appellant: I&M Bank Ltd; Respondent: Sebulikoko Niyomwungeri Emmanuel (uhagarariye ECSNE); Guarantor/respondent: Rwasibo Mutesi Béatrice
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
9 June 2017
Case Number
RCOMAA00052/2016/SC- RCOMAA0057/16/CS
Procedural Posture
Civil Commercial Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal by I&M Bank allowed; cross-appeal by Sebulikoko dismissed.
Legal Topics
Mortgage Registration, Enforcement of Security, Compensation, Auction of Collateral, Guarantee Liability
Commercial Law Contract Law Secured Transactions Mortgage Registration Enforcement of Security Compensation Auction of Collateral Guarantee Liability

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

I&M Bank Ltd

Appellant

Sebulikoko Niyomwungeri Emmanuel (uhagarariye ECSNE)

Respondent

Rwasibo Mutesi Béatrice

Guarantor/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Commercial Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether failure to renew registration of a mortgage extinguishes the bank's rights over the collateral if the underlying debt remains unpaid
  2. 2 Whether the auction of collateral was lawful despite expiry of registration period
  3. 3 Whether compensation is due to the debtor for alleged unlawful sale of collateral

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the mortgage remained valid between the parties as long as the underlying debt was unpaid, regardless of whether the registration was renewed. The auction of the collateral by I&M Bank was lawful. The respondents' claim for compensation was rejected. The bank's claim for damages was also rejected, but it was awarded litigation costs and attorney fees.

Court Disposition

Appeal by I&M Bank allowed; cross-appeal by Sebulikoko dismissed.

Orders

  • Sebulikoko Niyomwungeri Emmanuel and Rwasibo Mutesi Béatrice to jointly pay I&M Bank Ltd 300,000 Frw for litigation costs and 500,000 Frw for attorney fees.
  • Sebulikoko Niyomwungeri Emmanuel and Rwasibo Mutesi Béatrice to jointly pay I&M Bank Ltd 100,000 Frw for appeal security costs.