Intertrade f&c Ltd v. ikigo cy’igihugu cy’imisoro n’amahoro

Intertrade f&c Ltd v. ikigo cy’igihugu cy’imisoro n’amahoro

The Supreme Court held that VAT was lawfully assessed on Intertrade F&C Ltd at the time it delivered goods to Intercontact Trading, as evidenced by delivery notes, and that there was no deposit contract with MINADEF. The contracts between MINADEF and Intercontact Trading, and between Intercontact Trading and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMA0197/12/CS
Parties
Applicant: Intertrade F&C Ltd; Respondent: Ikigo cy’igihugu cy’imisoro n’amahoro (Rwanda Revenue Authority, RRA)
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
24 May 2014
Case Number
RCOMA0197/12/CS
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; lower court judgment affirmed.
Legal Topics
Value Added Tax (vat), Contractual Delivery, Partnership Agreements, Tax Assessment, Appeal Procedure
Tax Law Commercial Law Value Added Tax (vat) Contractual Delivery Partnership Agreements Tax Assessment Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Intertrade F&C Ltd

Applicant

Ikigo cy’igihugu cy’imisoro n’amahoro (Rwanda Revenue Authority, RRA)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Supreme Court Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether VAT was lawfully assessed on goods delivered by Intertrade F&C Ltd
  2. 2 Whether the contractual relationship between Intertrade F&C Ltd, Intercontact Trading, and MINADEF affects VAT liability
  3. 3 Whether the timing of VAT assessment was correct under the law

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that VAT was lawfully assessed on Intertrade F&C Ltd at the time it delivered goods to Intercontact Trading, as evidenced by delivery notes, and that there was no deposit contract with MINADEF. The contracts between MINADEF and Intercontact Trading, and between Intercontact Trading and Intertrade F&C Ltd, were distinct, and VAT liability arose upon delivery as per Article 20 of Law n° 06/2001. The applicant’s arguments regarding timing and double taxation were unfounded.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; lower court judgment affirmed.

Orders

  • Intertrade F&C Ltd to pay court costs of 27,200 Rwandan francs.