UBUSHINJACYAHA vs IRADUKUNDA

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs IRADUKUNDA

The sentence imposed on Iradukunda Diane could not be reduced further because it was already the minimum permitted by law for the offence, even after considering mitigating circumstances.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00295/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant: Iradukunda Diane
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 January 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00295/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Drug Trafficking, Mitigating Circumstances, Sentencing Guidelines
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Trafficking Mitigating Circumstances Sentencing Guidelines

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Iradukunda Diane

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on Iradukunda Diane could be further reduced given mitigating circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed on Iradukunda Diane could not be reduced further because it was already the minimum permitted by law for the offence, even after considering mitigating circumstances.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The judgment of the High Court, Rusizi Chamber, case RPA00014/2022/HC/RSZ of 11/04/2024 is upheld in all respects.
  • The sentence of 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 Frw remains unchanged.