IRAMIRO CLINIC v KAMBALI

IRAMIRO CLINIC v KAMBALI

The Court of Appeal found that Iramiro Clinic failed to demonstrate that the High Court relied on a non-existent law as defined by statute and precedent. The mere replacement of the judgment reading record did not constitute reliance on a non-existent law. Therefore, the second appeal was not within the jurisdiction...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCAA 00006/2022/CA
Parties
Appellant: Iramiro Clinic; Respondent: Kambali Bigishiro
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
9 September 2022
Case Number
RCAA 00006/2022/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)
Outcome
appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Appellate Courts, Non Existent Law as Ground for Appeal, Compensation and Set Off, Enforcement of Contractual Obligations
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Contract Law Jurisdiction of Appellate Courts Non Existent Law as Ground for Appeal Compensation and Set Off Enforcement of Contractual Obligations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Iramiro Clinic

Appellant

Kambali Bigishiro

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction over a second appeal based on the allegation that the High Court relied on a non-existent law
  2. 2 Whether the High Court's replacement of the judgment reading record constituted reliance on a non-existent law
  3. 3 Entitlement to legal costs and attorney fees

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that Iramiro Clinic failed to demonstrate that the High Court relied on a non-existent law as defined by statute and precedent. The mere replacement of the judgment reading record did not constitute reliance on a non-existent law. Therefore, the second appeal was not within the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal and was dismissed. Legal costs and attorney fees were awarded to Kambali Bigishiro.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction

Orders

  • Iramiro Clinic's second appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
  • Iramiro Clinic is ordered to pay Kambali Bigishiro 600,000 Frw for attorney fees and legal costs at this level.