ISHYAKA RIHARANIRA DEMOKARASI NO KURENGERA IBIDUKIKIJE MU RWANDA(DGPR) v. LETA YU RWANDA(2)

ISHYAKA RIHARANIRA DEMOKARASI NO KURENGERA IBIDUKIKIJE MU RWANDA(DGPR) v. LETA YU RWANDA(2)

The Supreme Court held that the Constitution of Rwanda does not prohibit the amendment of Article 101 regarding presidential term limits, provided the amendment follows the procedures set out in Article 193, including approval by referendum. The Court found that such amendments do not inherently violate democratic...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR_V.1_2016
Parties
Applicant: Ishyaka Riharanira Demokarasi no Kurengera Ibidukikije mu Rwanda (Democratic Green Party of Rwanda); Respondent: Leta y’u Rwanda
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
9 September 2015
Case Number
RS/SPEC/0002/15/CS
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Constitutional Amendment, Presidential Term Limits, Standing to Sue Government, Referendum, Democracy
Constitutional Law Constitutional Amendment Presidential Term Limits Standing to Sue Government Referendum Democracy

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ishyaka Riharanira Demokarasi no Kurengera Ibidukikije mu Rwanda (Democratic Green Party of Rwanda)

Applicant

Leta y’u Rwanda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Government of Rwanda could be sued in a constitutional challenge regarding amendment of Article 101 of the Constitution
  2. 2 Whether Article 101 of the Constitution of Rwanda (presidential term limits) can be amended

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the Constitution of Rwanda does not prohibit the amendment of Article 101 regarding presidential term limits, provided the amendment follows the procedures set out in Article 193, including approval by referendum. The Court found that such amendments do not inherently violate democratic principles if they reflect the will of the people and are conducted lawfully. The applicant's claim that Article 101 is unamendable was rejected.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

Orders

  • The claim by the Democratic Green Party of Rwanda is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The Constitution of Rwanda does not prohibit amendment of Article 101 in any of its parts.