ISHYAKA RIHARANIRA DEMOKARASI NO KURENGERA IBIDUKIKIJE MU RWANDA (DGPR) v. LETA Y’U RWANDA

ISHYAKA RIHARANIRA DEMOKARASI NO KURENGERA IBIDUKIKIJE MU RWANDA (DGPR) v. LETA Y’U RWANDA

The Supreme Court of Rwanda has jurisdiction to hear and determine cases concerning the interpretation of constitutional provisions and the constitutionality of acts, even in the absence of explicit statutory provision, as courts cannot abdicate their adjudicative responsibility. The application for amicus curiae...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.1 -2015
Parties
Applicant: Ishyaka Riharanira Demokarasi no Kurengera Ibidukikije mu Rwanda (DGPR); Respondent: Leta y’u Rwanda
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
8 October 2015
Case Number
RS/SPEC/0002/15/CS
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objections and Amicus Curiae Application
Outcome
preliminary objections dismissed; amicus curiae application denied; case to proceed on merits
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Supreme Court, Interpretation of Constitutional Provisions, Amicus Curiae, Preliminary Objections, Separation of Powers
Constitutional Law Administrative Law Jurisdiction of Supreme Court Interpretation of Constitutional Provisions Amicus Curiae Preliminary Objections Separation of Powers

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ishyaka Riharanira Demokarasi no Kurengera Ibidukikije mu Rwanda (DGPR)

Applicant

Leta y’u Rwanda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objections and Amicus Curiae Application

  1. 1 Whether the Supreme Court of Rwanda has jurisdiction to interpret constitutional provisions and hear claims regarding acts alleged to be unconstitutional
  2. 2 Whether the application for amicus curiae status by Centre for Human Rights Law Firm Ltd should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Rwanda has jurisdiction to hear and determine cases concerning the interpretation of constitutional provisions and the constitutionality of acts, even in the absence of explicit statutory provision, as courts cannot abdicate their adjudicative responsibility. The application for amicus curiae was denied as the applicant did not provide new or specialized knowledge beyond what was already before the Court.

Court Disposition

preliminary objections dismissed; amicus curiae application denied; case to proceed on merits

Orders

  • The application for amicus curiae status by Centre for Human Rights Law Firm Ltd is denied.
  • The preliminary objection on lack of jurisdiction is dismissed as unfounded.