JACQUES v. BANQUE DE KIGALI
A foreigner who files an appeal is considered a plaintiff at the appellate level and must pay the security deposit required for foreigners under article 87 of Law nº 21/2012 if requested by the respondent, as the rationale for the deposit applies equally at the appellate stage.
- Citation
- RCOMA 0093/12/CS
- Parties
- Appellant: Jacques Schillings; Respondent: Banque de Kigali (BK)
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 6 February 2015
- Case Number
- RCOMA 0093/12/CS
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Appeal / Interlocutory Objection on Security Deposit
- Outcome
- Objection upheld; appellant ordered to pay security deposit before proceedings continue.
- Legal Topics
- Security Deposit for Foreign Litigants, Appellate Procedure, Jurisdictional Objection
- Source Language
- en
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacques Schillings
Appellant
Banque de Kigali (BK)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Interlocutory Objection on Security Deposit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a foreign appellant must furnish a security deposit under article 87 of Law nº 21/2012 when appealing a commercial judgment
Ratio Decidendi
A foreigner who files an appeal is considered a plaintiff at the appellate level and must pay the security deposit required for foreigners under article 87 of Law nº 21/2012 if requested by the respondent, as the rationale for the deposit applies equally at the appellate stage.
Court Disposition
Objection upheld; appellant ordered to pay security deposit before proceedings continue.
Orders
- Jacques SCHILLINGS to pay a guarantee of 5,000,000 Frw in public account before 10/10/2014.
- Proceedings to continue on 13/10/2014 after deposit is paid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment