JEAN KAMBANDA v. THE PROSECUTOR (APPEAL JUDGEMENT)

JEAN KAMBANDA v. THE PROSECUTOR (APPEAL JUDGEMENT)

The Appeals Chamber found that Kambanda failed to raise his grounds at trial and did not demonstrate special circumstances to excuse this failure. The right to free legal assistance does not include the right to choose counsel. The guilty plea was voluntary, informed, unequivocal, and based on sufficient facts. The Trial Chamber properly considered mitigating circumstances and was within its discretion to impose a single life sentence. No error of law or abuse of discretion was found. All grounds of appeal were dismissed.

Citation
ICTR 97-23-A
Parties
Appellant: Jean Kambanda; Respondent: The Prosecutor
Court
International Tribunal for Rwanda
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
19 October 2000
Case Number
ICTR 97-23-A
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appeal Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed
Legal Topics
Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity, Guilty Plea Validity, Right to Counsel, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Waiver of Rights
Source Language
en, rw, fr
International Criminal Law Human Rights Law Genocide Crimes Against Humanity Guilty Plea Validity Right to Counsel Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jean Kambanda

Appellant

The Prosecutor

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was denied the right to counsel of his own choosing
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's detention was unlawful
  3. 3 Whether the guilty plea was voluntary, informed, unequivocal, and based on sufficient facts

Ratio Decidendi

The Appeals Chamber found that Kambanda failed to raise his grounds at trial and did not demonstrate special circumstances to excuse this failure. The right to free legal assistance does not include the right to choose counsel. The guilty plea was voluntary, informed, unequivocal, and based on sufficient facts. The Trial Chamber properly considered mitigating circumstances and was within its discretion to impose a single life sentence. No error of law or abuse of discretion was found. All grounds of appeal were dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; conviction and sentence affirmed

Orders

  • All eight grounds of appeal rejected
  • Conviction on all counts affirmed