Re KABAGEMA (RECT)

Re KABAGEMA (RECT)

Clerical errors in the judgment RADA 00013/2017/HC/NYZ, including incorrect case number, party names, and mislabeling as urgent, materially affect the enforceability and clarity of the judgment and must be corrected regardless of the one-month procedural limit.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/RECT/RAD 00001/2022/HC/NYZ
Parties
Applicant: Kabagema Clotilde Marie Rose; Respondent: Akarere ka Ruhango
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
26 April 2022
Case Number
RS/RECT/RAD 00001/2022/HC/NYZ
Procedural Posture
Administrative Correction / Post Judgment Correction
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Judgment Correction, Procedural Errors, Administrative Decisions
Source Language
rw
Administrative Law Judgment Correction Procedural Errors Administrative Decisions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kabagema Clotilde Marie Rose

Applicant

Akarere ka Ruhango

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Administrative Correction / Post Judgment Correction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there are clerical errors in judgment RADA 00013/2017/HC/NYZ that warrant correction

Ratio Decidendi

Clerical errors in the judgment RADA 00013/2017/HC/NYZ, including incorrect case number, party names, and mislabeling as urgent, materially affect the enforceability and clarity of the judgment and must be corrected regardless of the one-month procedural limit.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Judgment RADA 00013/2017/HC/NYZ is corrected as specified: case number, party names, and urgency label amended; section numbering corrected; this ruling supplements the corrected judgment.