10 Kalisa v. Ikigo cy’Igihugu gishinzwe Imisoro n’Amahoro

10 Kalisa v. Ikigo cy’Igihugu gishinzwe Imisoro n’Amahoro

The applicant failed to provide evidence justifying exclusion of the cheque amount from taxable income and did not substantiate entitlement to a VAT refund. The 2009 tax guidelines do not apply retroactively to tax years 2003-2005. The appeal lacks merit and the lower court's decision stands.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMA 0003/10/CS
Parties
Applicant: Kalisa Jérémie; Respondent: Ikigo cy’Igihugu gishinzwe Imisoro n’Amahoro (Rwanda Revenue Authority)
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
25 February 2011
Case Number
RCOMA 0003/10/CS
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; lower court judgment affirmed.
Legal Topics
Burden of Proof, Value Added Tax (vat), Tax Assessment, Appeals Procedure
Source Language
rw
Tax Law Civil Procedure Burden of Proof Value Added Tax (vat) Tax Assessment Appeals Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kalisa Jérémie

Applicant

Ikigo cy’Igihugu gishinzwe Imisoro n’Amahoro (Rwanda Revenue Authority)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tax Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicant proved entitlement to exclusion of 33,661,250 Rwf from taxable income based on 'écriture extournée' (reversed entry)
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to refund of 26,820,637 Rwf VAT charged inversely (TVA à l’inverse)

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide evidence justifying exclusion of the cheque amount from taxable income and did not substantiate entitlement to a VAT refund. The 2009 tax guidelines do not apply retroactively to tax years 2003-2005. The appeal lacks merit and the lower court's decision stands.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; lower court judgment affirmed.

Orders

  • Applicant to pay court costs of 33,700 Rwf within eight days, failing which enforcement will proceed.