UBUSHINJACYAHA v KAMANA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v KAMANA

The court held that Kamana Faustin had already benefited from sufficient mitigation, reducing his sentence from 20 to 16 years, and that further reduction below 15 years was not permitted under the amended law. The sentence was consistent with the gravity of the offence and comparable cases. The appeal was dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00298/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Kamana Faustin
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 January 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00298/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Kamana Faustin

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether Kamana Faustin is entitled to a further reduction of sentence below 16 years for trafficking cannabis.
  2. 2 Whether the sentence imposed is consistent with the law and comparable cases.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that Kamana Faustin had already benefited from sufficient mitigation, reducing his sentence from 20 to 16 years, and that further reduction below 15 years was not permitted under the amended law. The sentence was consistent with the gravity of the offence and comparable cases. The appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal of Kamana Faustin is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The judgment of the High Court (RPA 00618/2021/HC/RWG) is upheld in all its provisions.