Re KAMANZI (INCONST)

Re KAMANZI (INCONST)

The Supreme Court held that the differentiation in grounds for review between persons convicted by Gacaca courts and those convicted by ordinary courts is based on objective and reasonable criteria, justified by the special context, objectives, and procedures of Gacaca courts. This does not amount to prohibited...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.1-2024
Parties
Applicant: Kamanzi Anaclet; Respondent: Republic of Rwanda
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
31 March 2023
Case Number
RS/INCONST/SPEC 00002/2022/SC
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment
Outcome
petition dismissed
Legal Topics
Equality Before the Law, Non Discrimination, Right to Fair Trial, Genocide Cases, Gacaca Courts, Review of Criminal Judgments
Constitutional Law Criminal Procedure Human Rights Equality Before the Law Non Discrimination Right to Fair Trial Genocide Cases Gacaca Courts +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kamanzi Anaclet

Applicant

Republic of Rwanda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether paragraph 4 of Article 197 of Law Nº 027/2019 violates Articles 15, 16, and 29 of the Constitution of Rwanda by treating persons convicted by Gacaca courts differently from those convicted by ordinary courts regarding grounds for review of criminal judgments.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court held that the differentiation in grounds for review between persons convicted by Gacaca courts and those convicted by ordinary courts is based on objective and reasonable criteria, justified by the special context, objectives, and procedures of Gacaca courts. This does not amount to prohibited discrimination or denial of fair justice under Articles 15, 16, or 29 of the Constitution.

Court Disposition

petition dismissed

Orders

  • The petition by Kamanzi Anaclet is dismissed for lack of merit.
  • Paragraph 4 of Article 197 of Law Nº 027/2019 is not unconstitutional.