UBUSHINJACYAHA v. KANYEMERA NIYITEGEKA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. KANYEMERA NIYITEGEKA

The appellant is not entitled to a further reduction of sentence because the High Court already imposed the minimum sentence permitted by law for the offence, considering all mitigating circumstances, and the appellant failed to identify any legal or factual error in the prior judgment.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA01162/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant: Kanyemera Niyitegeka Egide
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
18 July 2025
Case Number
RPAA01162/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Appeals
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Kanyemera Niyitegeka Egide

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to a further reduction of sentence after already receiving the minimum possible sentence for the offence of trafficking narcotic drugs.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant is not entitled to a further reduction of sentence because the High Court already imposed the minimum sentence permitted by law for the offence, considering all mitigating circumstances, and the appellant failed to identify any legal or factual error in the prior judgment.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal of Kanyemera Niyitegeka Egide is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The judgment of the High Court in RPA01549/2021/HC/KIG dated 11/10/2024 is upheld in all respects.