KANZAYIRE v. NYIRABIZIMANA N’UNDI

KANZAYIRE v. NYIRABIZIMANA N’UNDI

Applications to intervene against Supreme Court judgments are inadmissible, as neither the law in force at the time of filing nor subsequent law provides for such a procedure. The only exceptions to the finality of Supreme Court judgments are revision on new grounds or correction of errors, not intervention by third...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.1 - 2015
Parties
Applicant: Kanzayire Epiphanie; Interested Party: Musoni Ndamage Thadée; Respondent: Nyirabizimana Zilipa
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
21 June 2013
Case Number
RCAA 0070/12/CS
Procedural Posture
Civil / Supreme Court Application to Intervene (itambamira) in Final Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Finality of Supreme Court Judgments, Intervention in Proceedings, Appellate Procedure
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Constitutional Law Finality of Supreme Court Judgments Intervention in Proceedings Appellate Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kanzayire Epiphanie

Applicant

Musoni Ndamage Thadée

Interested Party

Nyirabizimana Zilipa

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil / Supreme Court Application to Intervene (itambamira) in Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether an application to intervene (itambamira) is admissible against a final Supreme Court judgment
  2. 2 Which law applies to the admissibility of such applications when the law changes between filing and hearing

Ratio Decidendi

Applications to intervene against Supreme Court judgments are inadmissible, as neither the law in force at the time of filing nor subsequent law provides for such a procedure. The only exceptions to the finality of Supreme Court judgments are revision on new grounds or correction of errors, not intervention by third parties.

Court Disposition

application dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • Application to intervene (itambamira) dismissed as inadmissible.
  • Applicant ordered to pay court costs of 42,800 Rwandan francs within eight days, failing which enforcement will be by State action.