KARAGIRE v. DOFFICE

KARAGIRE v. DOFFICE

The grounds advanced by Karagire were based on dissatisfaction with previous judgments and speculative allegations of bias, lacking concrete evidence as required by Article 103 of Law No 22/2018. Therefore, the application for recusal had no legal basis.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/RECUS/RCOMAA 00002/2023/CA
Parties
Applicant: Karagire Yaramba Jean Baptiste; Respondent: D’OFFICE
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
21 December 2023
Case Number
RS/RECUS/RCOMAA 00002/2023/CA
Procedural Posture
Recusal Application / Appellate Decision
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Recusal of Judge, Grounds for Recusal, Judicial Impartiality
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Judicial Ethics Recusal of Judge Grounds for Recusal Judicial Impartiality

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Karagire Yaramba Jean Baptiste

Applicant

D’OFFICE

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Recusal Application / Appellate Decision

  1. 1 Whether the grounds advanced by Karagire Yaramba Jean Baptiste justify the recusal of Judge Kamere Emmanuel from case RCOMAA 00015/2023/CA.

Ratio Decidendi

The grounds advanced by Karagire were based on dissatisfaction with previous judgments and speculative allegations of bias, lacking concrete evidence as required by Article 103 of Law No 22/2018. Therefore, the application for recusal had no legal basis.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The recusal application by Karagire Yaramba Jean Baptiste is dismissed as unfounded.
  • Case RCOMAA 00015/2023/CA will be heard by a different panel for the applicant's reassurance.