Karemera v. Ubushinjacyaha

Karemera v. Ubushinjacyaha

The Court held that the 15-year sentence imposed on Karemera Pheneas was the minimum sentence allowed by law for the offence of defiling a child under 14 years of age, so it could not be reduced further; the appeal therefore had no merit.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Karemera Pheneas; Respondent: Ubushinjacyaha
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Before the Rwanda Court of Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Defilement of a Child, Mitigating Circumstances, Minimum Sentence, Sentence Reduction
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Appeal Procedure Defilement of a Child Mitigating Circumstances Minimum Sentence Sentence Reduction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Karemera Pheneas

Appellant

Ubushinjacyaha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Before the Rwanda Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether a sentence already reduced to the minimum allowed by law can be reduced further on appeal for mitigating circumstances.
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's appeal against sentence had merit.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that the 15-year sentence imposed on Karemera Pheneas was the minimum sentence allowed by law for the offence of defiling a child under 14 years of age, so it could not be reduced further; the appeal therefore had no merit.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal of Karemera Pheneas is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The judgment in RPA 00269/2022/HC/RWG delivered on 18/07/2025 is affirmed.