KARENZO v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

KARENZO v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

The conviction was upheld because the combined evidence—victim's account, corroborating witness testimony (including the appellant's wife), and medical findings—was consistent and credible. The familial relationship of witnesses did not invalidate their testimony. However, the sentence was reduced from 25 to 15...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00125/2023/CA
Parties
Appellant: Karenzo Mukarage Aphrodis; Respondent: Ubushinjacyaha
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
19 December 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00125/2023/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed in part, sentence varied
Legal Topics
Defilement of a Minor, Assessment of Evidence, Testimony of Related Witnesses, Reduction of Sentence for First Offenders
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Evidence Law Child Protection Defilement of a Minor Assessment of Evidence Testimony of Related Witnesses Reduction of Sentence for First Offenders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Karenzo Mukarage Aphrodis

Appellant

Ubushinjacyaha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for defilement of a minor was based on doubtful evidence
  2. 2 Whether testimony from related witnesses with alleged conflicts should be excluded
  3. 3 Whether medical evidence was sufficient to prove defilement

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction was upheld because the combined evidence—victim's account, corroborating witness testimony (including the appellant's wife), and medical findings—was consistent and credible. The familial relationship of witnesses did not invalidate their testimony. However, the sentence was reduced from 25 to 15 years due to the appellant's status as a first-time offender and his youth at the time of the offense.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed in part, sentence varied

Orders

  • Conviction for defilement of a minor affirmed
  • Sentence reduced from 25 years to 15 years imprisonment