UBUSHINJACYAHA v. KARIKUMUTIMA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. KARIKUMUTIMA

The appellant had already received the minimum sentence allowed by law for the offense of trafficking significant quantities of narcotics, and no further reduction is legally permissible. The appeal lacked merit as there was no error in the previous judgment.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA00648/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant: Karikumutima Aminat
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
22 May 2025
Case Number
RPAA00648/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Appeals
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Karikumutima Aminat

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to a further reduction of sentence after already receiving a substantial reduction at the High Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant had already received the minimum sentence allowed by law for the offense of trafficking significant quantities of narcotics, and no further reduction is legally permissible. The appeal lacked merit as there was no error in the previous judgment.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The judgment of the High Court (RPA00069/2023/HC/MUS) is upheld in all respects.
  • Karikumutima Aminat remains sentenced to 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 Rwandan Francs.