KAYIGEMA v UWARUDAHUNGA N’ABANDI

KAYIGEMA v UWARUDAHUNGA N’ABANDI

Kayigema Anicet's appeal was filed 30 days after the judgment, exceeding the three-day deadline for appeals in urgent auction annulment cases as required by law. No valid justification for the delay was provided. Therefore, the appeal is inadmissible.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA 00089/2019/CA
Parties
Applicant: Kayigema Anicet; Respondent: Uwarudahunga Joséphine; Respondent: COGEBANQUE Ltd; Respondent: RDB
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
17 February 2020
Case Number
RCOMAA 00089/2019/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Admissibility of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed as inadmissible for being filed out of time.
Legal Topics
Auction Annulment, Appeal Admissibility, Procedural Time Limits
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Auction Annulment Appeal Admissibility Procedural Time Limits

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kayigema Anicet

Applicant

Uwarudahunga Joséphine

Respondent

COGEBANQUE Ltd

Respondent

RDB

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Admissibility of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether Kayigema Anicet's appeal should be admitted given it was filed out of time

Ratio Decidendi

Kayigema Anicet's appeal was filed 30 days after the judgment, exceeding the three-day deadline for appeals in urgent auction annulment cases as required by law. No valid justification for the delay was provided. Therefore, the appeal is inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed as inadmissible for being filed out of time.

Orders

  • The appeal of Kayigema Anicet is not admitted.
  • Court fees paid by Kayigema Anicet are to be retained as per the proceedings.