UBUSHINJACYAHA v. KIRABO

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. KIRABO

The application for revision for injustice is admissible because the applicant alleges disregard of manifest evidence and law, satisfying the requirements of Article 81(2) of Organic Law No. 03/2012/OL. The inspection report is not an evidentiary document for the merits and its absence does not prejudice the parties.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/REV/INJUST/PEN 0001/13/CS
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Applicant: KIRABO Kayoshe Idah; Respondent: Akarere ka Kayonza; Civil Claimants: Abaregera indishyi (family of BUNYENYEZI Christophe)
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 February 2014
Case Number
RS/REV/INJUST/PEN 0001/13/CS
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Preliminary Ruling on Admissibility of Revision for Injustice
Outcome
Application for revision admitted for hearing on the merits; objections dismissed.
Legal Topics
Revision for Injustice, Forgery, Expropriation, Restitution, Inheritance Law
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Revision for Injustice Forgery Expropriation Restitution Inheritance Law

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

KIRABO Kayoshe Idah

Applicant

Akarere ka Kayonza

Respondent

Abaregera indishyi (family of BUNYENYEZI Christophe)

Civil Claimants

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Preliminary Ruling on Admissibility of Revision for Injustice

  1. 1 Whether the application for revision for injustice is admissible under Article 81 of Organic Law No. 03/2012/OL
  2. 2 Whether the inspection report must be disclosed to the parties
  3. 3 Whether previous courts disregarded manifest evidence and law

Ratio Decidendi

The application for revision for injustice is admissible because the applicant alleges disregard of manifest evidence and law, satisfying the requirements of Article 81(2) of Organic Law No. 03/2012/OL. The inspection report is not an evidentiary document for the merits and its absence does not prejudice the parties.

Court Disposition

Application for revision admitted for hearing on the merits; objections dismissed.

Orders

  • Objections by civil claimants dismissed as unfounded.
  • Application for revision by Kirabo Kayoshe Idah admitted for hearing on the merits.