UBUSHINJACYAHA v MANIRIHO

UBUSHINJACYAHA v MANIRIHO

Due to conflicting evidence regarding the victim's age and the absence of a definitive birth certificate or equivalent judicial decision, the court found reasonable doubt as to whether the victim was underage at the time of cohabitation. In accordance with the principle that doubt must benefit the accused, Maniriho...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00105/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Maniriho Jérôme
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 May 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00105/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction overturned; acquittal entered.
Legal Topics
Defilement, Proof of Age, Evidentiary Standards, Benefit of the Doubt
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Defilement Proof of Age Evidentiary Standards Benefit of the Doubt

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Maniriho Jérôme

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for defilement was supported by conclusive evidence of the victim's age

Ratio Decidendi

Due to conflicting evidence regarding the victim's age and the absence of a definitive birth certificate or equivalent judicial decision, the court found reasonable doubt as to whether the victim was underage at the time of cohabitation. In accordance with the principle that doubt must benefit the accused, Maniriho Jérôme was acquitted.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction overturned; acquittal entered.

Orders

  • The judgment of the High Court/Rwamagana Chamber of 29/01/2024 is set aside in all its parts.
  • Maniriho Jérôme is acquitted of the charge of defilement.