UBUSHINJACYAHA v. MANIRIHO

UBUSHINJACYAHA v. MANIRIHO

The appellate court found that the evidence, including witness testimony and the defendant's own signed seizure report, established that Maniriho Samuel possessed 36 packets of cannabis for the purpose of sale, not personal consumption. The court held that the High Court did not err in convicting him for drug...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00369/2025/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Maniriho Samuel
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
18 November 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00369/2025/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Evidence Assessment, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Offences Evidence Assessment Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Maniriho Samuel

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the High Court erred in convicting Maniriho Samuel for drug trafficking instead of possession for personal use

Ratio Decidendi

The appellate court found that the evidence, including witness testimony and the defendant's own signed seizure report, established that Maniriho Samuel possessed 36 packets of cannabis for the purpose of sale, not personal consumption. The court held that the High Court did not err in convicting him for drug trafficking, and the conviction and sentence should stand.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The High Court judgment RPA 00224/2022/HC/KIG dated 19/03/2025 remains unchanged.
  • The sentence of 15 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 Rwandan Francs imposed on Maniriho Samuel stands.