UBUSHINJACYAHA v MANIZABAYO

UBUSHINJACYAHA v MANIZABAYO

Mistake of fact as to the victim's age is not a defense to defilement under Rwandan law, and the sentence cannot be reduced below the statutory minimum based on victim satisfaction or child interest. The appeal grounds were also raised out of time and are inadmissible.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00055/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant: Manizabayo Patrick
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 March 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00055/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Defilement, Strict Liability, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Child Protection Defilement Strict Liability Sentencing Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Manizabayo Patrick

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether mistake of fact as to the victim's age is a defense to defilement under Rwandan law
  2. 2 Whether the sentence for defilement can be reduced below the statutory minimum based on victim satisfaction or interest of the child

Ratio Decidendi

Mistake of fact as to the victim's age is not a defense to defilement under Rwandan law, and the sentence cannot be reduced below the statutory minimum based on victim satisfaction or child interest. The appeal grounds were also raised out of time and are inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The judgment of the High Court, RPA 00239/2021/HC/RWG of 16/01/2024, is upheld.
  • The sentence of 15 years' imprisonment imposed on Manizabayo Patrick remains in force.