MBARUSHIMANA v. NTIGURIRWA N’ABANDI

MBARUSHIMANA v. NTIGURIRWA N’ABANDI

The Supreme Court has jurisdiction over the appeal because the dispute concerns compensation originally set by the Intermediate Court at 83,300,000 RWF, regardless of the High Court's subsequent annulment of that award.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.3-2016
Parties
Appellant: Mbarushimana Boniface; Respondent: Succession Ntigurirwa Eustache; Respondent: Akarere ka Muhanga
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
19 June 2015
Case Number
RCAA0010/13/CS
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed; Supreme Court has jurisdiction; hearing to continue
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Supreme Court, Compensation in Property Disputes, Auction Annulment
Civil Procedure Property Law Jurisdiction of Supreme Court Compensation in Property Disputes Auction Annulment

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mbarushimana Boniface

Appellant

Succession Ntigurirwa Eustache

Respondent

Akarere ka Muhanga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Preliminary Objection Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction over the appeal based on the amount of compensation previously awarded by lower courts

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court has jurisdiction over the appeal because the dispute concerns compensation originally set by the Intermediate Court at 83,300,000 RWF, regardless of the High Court's subsequent annulment of that award.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed; Supreme Court has jurisdiction; hearing to continue

Orders

  • Objection by Succession Ntigurirwa dismissed
  • Supreme Court affirms its jurisdiction over the appeal