METROPOLE MOTORS Ltd vs. COGEBANQUE Plc

METROPOLE MOTORS Ltd vs. COGEBANQUE Plc

The court held that the document submitted by Metropole Motors Ltd did not constitute new evidence within the meaning of Article 170 of Law Nº 22/2018, as it was available or could have been obtained during the original proceedings and did not resolve any material dispute regarding the debt. Therefore, the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/REV/RCOM 00001/2021/CA
Parties
Applicant: Metropole Motors Ltd; Respondent: COGEBANQUE Plc
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
20 May 2022
Case Number
RS/REV/RCOM 00001/2021/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Revision / Court of Appeal – Application for Revision Based on New Evidence
Outcome
Application dismissed as inadmissible
Legal Topics
Loan Agreements, Banking Disputes, Revision of Judgments, New Evidence, Procedural Bars
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Loan Agreements Banking Disputes Revision of Judgments New Evidence Procedural Bars

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Metropole Motors Ltd

Applicant

COGEBANQUE Plc

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Revision / Court of Appeal – Application for Revision Based on New Evidence

  1. 1 Whether the applicant's evidence qualifies as 'new evidence' under Article 170 of Law Nº 22/2018 for revision of judgment
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to damages or reduction of debt based on the alleged new evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the document submitted by Metropole Motors Ltd did not constitute new evidence within the meaning of Article 170 of Law Nº 22/2018, as it was available or could have been obtained during the original proceedings and did not resolve any material dispute regarding the debt. Therefore, the application for revision was inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed as inadmissible

Orders

  • Application for revision dismissed as inadmissible
  • Metropole Motors Ltd ordered to pay COGEBANQUE Plc 700,000 Frw for legal costs and attorney fees