MIHIGO v. AKARERE KA KARONGI

MIHIGO v. AKARERE KA KARONGI

Mihigo Bernard did not have a direct and personal interest to sue Akarere ka Karongi because the assignment of debt from CBS was not formally notified or accepted by the debtor, and CBS continued to act as the party with the direct interest in the enforcement of the judgment. Therefore, Mihigo's claim was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/INJUST/RCOM 00007/2024/SC
Parties
Applicant: Mihigo Bernard; Respondent: Akarere ka Karongi; Third Party: Consutancy Building Services Company Ltd (CBS)
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
20 June 2025
Case Number
RS/INJUST/RCOM 00007/2024/SC
Procedural Posture
Commercial/review (supreme Court) / Final Judgment on Review for Injustice
Outcome
Application for review dismissed for lack of standing; prior judgments upheld.
Legal Topics
Standing to Sue, Assignment of Debt (cession De Créance), Direct and Personal Interest, Review for Injustice
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Standing to Sue Assignment of Debt (cession De Créance) Direct and Personal Interest Review for Injustice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mihigo Bernard

Applicant

Akarere ka Karongi

Respondent

Consutancy Building Services Company Ltd (CBS)

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Commercial/review (supreme Court) / Final Judgment on Review for Injustice

  1. 1 Whether Mihigo Bernard had a direct and personal interest to sue Akarere ka Karongi for payment based on assignment of debt from CBS
  2. 2 Whether the assignment of debt (cession de créance) was valid and opposable to the debtor (Akarere ka Karongi)

Ratio Decidendi

Mihigo Bernard did not have a direct and personal interest to sue Akarere ka Karongi because the assignment of debt from CBS was not formally notified or accepted by the debtor, and CBS continued to act as the party with the direct interest in the enforcement of the judgment. Therefore, Mihigo's claim was inadmissible for lack of standing.

Court Disposition

Application for review dismissed for lack of standing; prior judgments upheld.

Orders

  • The application by Mihigo Bernard for review on grounds of injustice is dismissed as unfounded.
  • It is confirmed that Mihigo Bernard had no direct and personal interest to claim payment from Akarere ka Karongi.