UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. MUGIMBA Jean Baptiste

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. MUGIMBA Jean Baptiste

The court found that Mugimba Jean Baptiste organized a meeting at his home on 08/04/1994 where a plan to kill Tutsi was made, lists of victims were drawn, and weapons were requested and later distributed, which constituted conspiracy to commit genocide and complicity in genocide. The court held that credible testimony, especially from DAM and DFM, established these facts beyond reasonable doubt. The court further held that prosecution was not barred by the principle of non-retroactivity due to the jus cogens nature of the crime of genocide and subsequent legislative provisions allowing prosecution for acts committed in 1994.

Citation
RP/GEN 00002/2017/HC/HCCIC
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Mugimba Jean Baptiste
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
17 March 2022
Case Number
RP/GEN 00002/2017/HC/HCCIC
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment at First Instance (high Court)
Outcome
Conviction
Legal Topics
Genocide, Conspiracy to Commit Genocide, Complicity in Genocide, Extradition, Criminal Procedure, Evidence, Retroactivity of Criminal Law
Source Language
rw

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 33 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Mugimba Jean Baptiste

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment at First Instance (high Court)

  1. 1 Whether Mugimba Jean Baptiste organized a meeting at his home on 08/04/1994 to plan genocide
  2. 2 Whether Mugimba Jean Baptiste provided material support (weapons, lists, etc.) making him complicit in genocide
  3. 3 Whether acts committed before the enactment of relevant laws can be prosecuted under international and Rwandan law

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Mugimba Jean Baptiste organized a meeting at his home on 08/04/1994 where a plan to kill Tutsi was made, lists of victims were drawn, and weapons were requested and later distributed, which constituted conspiracy to commit genocide and complicity in genocide. The court held that credible testimony, especially from DAM and DFM, established these facts beyond reasonable doubt. The court further held that prosecution was not barred by the principle of non-retroactivity due to the jus cogens nature of the crime of genocide and subsequent legislative provisions allowing prosecution for acts committed in 1994.

Court Disposition

Conviction

Orders

  • Mugimba Jean Baptiste is found guilty of conspiracy to commit genocide and complicity in genocide.
  • Sentenced to 25 years imprisonment.