UBUSHINJACYAHA vs. MUGIMBA Jean Baptiste
The court found that Mugimba Jean Baptiste organized a meeting at his home on 08/04/1994 where a plan to kill Tutsi was made, lists of victims were drawn, and weapons were requested and later distributed, which constituted conspiracy to commit genocide and complicity in genocide. The court held that credible testimony, especially from DAM and DFM, established these facts beyond reasonable doubt. The court further held that prosecution was not barred by the principle of non-retroactivity due to the jus cogens nature of the crime of genocide and subsequent legislative provisions allowing prosecution for acts committed in 1994.
- Citation
- RP/GEN 00002/2017/HC/HCCIC
- Parties
- Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Mugimba Jean Baptiste
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2022
- Case Number
- RP/GEN 00002/2017/HC/HCCIC
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment at First Instance (high Court)
- Outcome
- Conviction
- Legal Topics
- Genocide, Conspiracy to Commit Genocide, Complicity in Genocide, Extradition, Criminal Procedure, Evidence, Retroactivity of Criminal Law
- Source Language
- rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ubushinjacyaha
Prosecution
Mugimba Jean Baptiste
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment at First Instance (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mugimba Jean Baptiste organized a meeting at his home on 08/04/1994 to plan genocide
- 2 Whether Mugimba Jean Baptiste provided material support (weapons, lists, etc.) making him complicit in genocide
- 3 Whether acts committed before the enactment of relevant laws can be prosecuted under international and Rwandan law
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Mugimba Jean Baptiste organized a meeting at his home on 08/04/1994 where a plan to kill Tutsi was made, lists of victims were drawn, and weapons were requested and later distributed, which constituted conspiracy to commit genocide and complicity in genocide. The court held that credible testimony, especially from DAM and DFM, established these facts beyond reasonable doubt. The court further held that prosecution was not barred by the principle of non-retroactivity due to the jus cogens nature of the crime of genocide and subsequent legislative provisions allowing prosecution for acts committed in 1994.
Court Disposition
Conviction
Orders
- Mugimba Jean Baptiste is found guilty of conspiracy to commit genocide and complicity in genocide.
- Sentenced to 25 years imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment