MUKAGIFUNDU N’UNDI v. UWAMARIYA N’UNDI

MUKAGIFUNDU N’UNDI v. UWAMARIYA N’UNDI

The court held that all parties affected by the judgment subject to revision for injustice must be summoned, regardless of whether they individually requested revision, to ensure procedural fairness and avoid decisions affecting unrepresented parties.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.3-2020
Parties
Applicant: Mukagifundu Pauline; Applicant: Mukamutana Hyacinthe; Respondent: Uwamariya Agnès; Respondent: Muhawenimana Bernadette; Respondent: Uwizeyimana Marie Goretti
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
21 April 2019
Case Number
RS/REV/INJUST/CIV0011/16/CS
Procedural Posture
Civil Revision for Injustice / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Outcome
preliminary objection dismissed
Legal Topics
Revision for Injustice, Joinder of Parties, Procedural Fairness
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Revision for Injustice Joinder of Parties Procedural Fairness

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mukagifundu Pauline

Applicant

Mukamutana Hyacinthe

Applicant

Uwamariya Agnès

Respondent

Muhawenimana Bernadette

Respondent

Uwizeyimana Marie Goretti

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Revision for Injustice / Preliminary Objection Ruling

  1. 1 Whether Mukamutana Hyacinthe's claim should be admitted despite not individually requesting revision for injustice
  2. 2 Whether all parties affected by the judgment must be summoned in revision proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that all parties affected by the judgment subject to revision for injustice must be summoned, regardless of whether they individually requested revision, to ensure procedural fairness and avoid decisions affecting unrepresented parties.

Court Disposition

preliminary objection dismissed

Orders

  • The objection raised by Me Nkubayingoga Samuel is dismissed as baseless.
  • The hearing will proceed to the merits on 27/06/2017.