UBUSHINJACYAHA v MUKANSANGA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v MUKANSANGA

The appeal was dismissed because the court found that, despite the appellant's admission of guilt and mitigating factors, the extreme cruelty of the murder justified maintaining the 25-year sentence, and the court is not compelled to reduce the sentence further.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00290/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant: Mukansanga Verediana
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
20 December 2024
Case Number
RPAA 00290/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Appeal, Murder
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances Appeal Murder

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Mukansanga Verediana

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the appellant should receive a further reduction in sentence due to admission of guilt and mitigating circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the court found that, despite the appellant's admission of guilt and mitigating factors, the extreme cruelty of the murder justified maintaining the 25-year sentence, and the court is not compelled to reduce the sentence further.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The judgment of the High Court, Rusizi Chamber, sentencing Mukansanga Verediana to 25 years' imprisonment is upheld.
  • Court costs are to be borne by the State.