MUNYAMPUNDU N’UNDI v. IKIGO CY’IMISORO N’AMAHORO_kn

MUNYAMPUNDU N’UNDI v. IKIGO CY’IMISORO N’AMAHORO_kn

Seizure of personal assets of shareholders or directors to satisfy company tax debts is unlawful unless a court has first determined their liability for the company's tax default. The principle of separate legal personality must be respected except where a court, upon clear evidence, decides to pierce the corporate...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RLR V.4-2018
Parties
Applicant: Munyampundu Antoine; Applicant: Mukarugambwa Béatrice; Respondent: Ikigo cy’Imisoro n’Amahôro
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
22 December 2017
Case Number
RCOMAA00040/2016/CS
Procedural Posture
Commercial/tax Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; asset seizure set aside.
Legal Topics
Piercing Corporate Veil, Shareholder/director Liability, Tax Enforcement, Asset Seizure, Separate Legal Personality
Source Language
rw
Company Law Tax Law Civil Procedure Piercing Corporate Veil Shareholder/director Liability Tax Enforcement Asset Seizure Separate Legal Personality

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Munyampundu Antoine

Applicant

Mukarugambwa Béatrice

Applicant

Ikigo cy’Imisoro n’Amahôro

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial/tax Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the seizure of personal assets of shareholders/directors for company tax debts without a court order is lawful
  2. 2 Whether liability of shareholders/directors for company tax debts requires prior judicial determination

Ratio Decidendi

Seizure of personal assets of shareholders or directors to satisfy company tax debts is unlawful unless a court has first determined their liability for the company's tax default. The principle of separate legal personality must be respected except where a court, upon clear evidence, decides to pierce the corporate veil.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; asset seizure set aside.

Orders

  • Seizure of assets of Munyampundu Antoine and Mukarugambwa Béatrice is nullified.
  • Rwanda Revenue Authority to pay Mukarugambwa Béatrice 500,000 Frw for case follow-up and 1,000,000 Frw for legal fees.