UBUSHINJACYAHA v TUYIZERE
The appellate court found that the lower court erred by failing to properly assess evidence of provocation and exculpatory witness statements. It held that the defendant acted under provocation, which legally reduces the sentence for murder from 25 years to 5 years imprisonment under the relevant statute.
- Citation
- RPAA 00931/2024/CA
- Parties
- Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant/defendant: Tuyizere Ramadhan
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 29 September 2025
- Case Number
- RPAA 00931/2024/CA
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal partially allowed; sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Provocation, Admissibility of Evidence, Sentencing, Witness Testimony
- Source Language
- rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ubushinjacyaha
Prosecution
Tuyizere Ramadhan
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction should be for murder or for assault causing death
- 2 Whether the defendant acted under provocation (ubusembure)
- 3 Whether the lower court erred in disregarding exculpatory evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The appellate court found that the lower court erred by failing to properly assess evidence of provocation and exculpatory witness statements. It held that the defendant acted under provocation, which legally reduces the sentence for murder from 25 years to 5 years imprisonment under the relevant statute.
Court Disposition
appeal partially allowed; sentence reduced
Orders
- Conviction for murder upheld; sentence reduced to 5 years imprisonment due to provocation
- Court costs to be borne by the State
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment