UBUSHINJACYAHA vs MURENGEZI

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs MURENGEZI

The Court of Appeal held that the High Court had already sufficiently considered mitigating circumstances and reduced the sentence appropriately; there was no legal or discretionary error warranting further reduction. The appeal was therefore dismissed and the sentence of 18 years imprisonment and a fine of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00307/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Murengezi Léonce
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
28 January 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00307/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Drug Trafficking, Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Trafficking Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Murengezi Léonce

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on Murengezi Léonce should be further reduced on appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal held that the High Court had already sufficiently considered mitigating circumstances and reduced the sentence appropriately; there was no legal or discretionary error warranting further reduction. The appeal was therefore dismissed and the sentence of 18 years imprisonment and a fine of 5,000,000 Frw was upheld.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by Murengezi Léonce is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The High Court judgment (RPA01082/2020/HC/KIG) of 19/04/2024 remains unchanged.