MURENZI v. D’OFFICE

MURENZI v. D’OFFICE

The court found that a clerical error occurred in the dispositive part of judgment RCOM 00009/2022/CA regarding the year of the shareholders' agreement, and that this error should be corrected from 17/01/2015 to 17/01/2025 in accordance with Article 140 of Law Nº 22/2018.

Citation
RS/RECT/RCOM 00001/2025/CA
Parties
Applicant: Murenzi Donatien; Respondent: D’OFFICE
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
19 March 2025
Case Number
RS/RECT/RCOM 00001/2025/CA
Procedural Posture
Rectification of Judgment / Judgment
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Rectification of Judgment, Clerical Error, Date Correction
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Rectification of Judgment Clerical Error Date Correction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Murenzi Donatien

Applicant

D’OFFICE

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Rectification of Judgment / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there was a clerical error in the date recorded in the dispositive part of judgment RCOM 00009/2022/CA that requires correction

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that a clerical error occurred in the dispositive part of judgment RCOM 00009/2022/CA regarding the year of the shareholders' agreement, and that this error should be corrected from 17/01/2015 to 17/01/2025 in accordance with Article 140 of Law Nº 22/2018.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • The application to rectify judgment RCOM 00009/2022/CA is granted.
  • In paragraph 13 on page 5 of judgment RCOM 00009/2022/CA, the date '17/01/2015' is corrected to '17/01/2025'.