MUSABINEMA HILAIRE v. AIRTEL TIGO RWANDA LTD N’UNDI

MUSABINEMA HILAIRE v. AIRTEL TIGO RWANDA LTD N’UNDI

The applicant is permitted to withdraw the application for review on grounds of injustice as per the law. However, the applicant is liable to pay attorney fees and certain costs to the respondents as determined by the court's discretion, but not all claimed amounts, since the review was not based on any fault found...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/INJUST/RCOM 00012/2022/SC
Parties
Applicant: MUSABINEMA Hilaire; Respondent: AIRTEL TIGO RWANDA LTD; Respondent: HABINGOMA Jacques
Court
Supreme Court
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
20 December 2022
Case Number
RS/INJUST/RCOM 00012/2022/SC
Procedural Posture
Commercial Review / Supreme Court – Application for Review on Grounds of Injustice, With Subsequent Withdrawal of Claim
Outcome
Application for review withdrawn; applicant ordered to pay specified attorney fees and costs to respondents.
Legal Topics
Withdrawal of Claim, Costs and Attorney Fees, Review on Grounds of Injustice
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Withdrawal of Claim Costs and Attorney Fees Review on Grounds of Injustice

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MUSABINEMA Hilaire

Applicant

AIRTEL TIGO RWANDA LTD

Respondent

HABINGOMA Jacques

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Review / Supreme Court – Application for Review on Grounds of Injustice, With Subsequent Withdrawal of Claim

  1. 1 Whether the applicant may withdraw the application for review on grounds of injustice and the consequences thereof
  2. 2 Entitlement of respondents to costs and attorney fees upon withdrawal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant is permitted to withdraw the application for review on grounds of injustice as per the law. However, the applicant is liable to pay attorney fees and certain costs to the respondents as determined by the court's discretion, but not all claimed amounts, since the review was not based on any fault found in the original judgment.

Court Disposition

Application for review withdrawn; applicant ordered to pay specified attorney fees and costs to respondents.

Orders

  • Withdrawal of the application for review is accepted.
  • Applicant to pay HABINGOMA Jacques 500,000 Frw as attorney fees.