MUSABYIMANA N’UNDI v. ECOBANK RWANDA Plc N’UNDI

MUSABYIMANA N’UNDI v. ECOBANK RWANDA Plc N’UNDI

The claim to intervene was inadmissible because the underlying case had not been decided on the merits, as the main claim had not been admitted. Article 161(3) requires that only cases decided on the merits and no longer subject to appeal may be subject to intervention. No error was made by the Commercial High Court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA 00078/2024/CA
Parties
Appellant: Musabyimana Célestin na Somayire Rubona Freddy; Respondent: ECOBANK RWANDA Plc; Intervener: INTERTRADE FC Ltd
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
10 December 2025
Case Number
RCOMAA 00078/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Intervention in Proceedings, Admissibility of Claims, Appeal Procedure, Costs and Attorney Fees
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Intervention in Proceedings Admissibility of Claims Appeal Procedure Costs and Attorney Fees

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Musabyimana Célestin na Somayire Rubona Freddy

Appellant

ECOBANK RWANDA Plc

Respondent

INTERTRADE FC Ltd

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the Commercial High Court erred in refusing to admit the appellants' claim to intervene in RS/REV/RCOM 00008/2022/HCC
  2. 2 Whether the appellants are entitled to costs and attorney fees

Ratio Decidendi

The claim to intervene was inadmissible because the underlying case had not been decided on the merits, as the main claim had not been admitted. Article 161(3) requires that only cases decided on the merits and no longer subject to appeal may be subject to intervention. No error was made by the Commercial High Court in refusing to admit the intervention claim. Costs and attorney fees were awarded to the respondent as the appeal was dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The judgment of the Commercial High Court refusing to admit the intervention claim stands.
  • Appellants Musabyimana Célestin and Somayire Rubona Freddy to pay ECOBANK RWANDA Plc a total of 1,600,000 Frw in attorney fees and costs.