UBUSHINJACYAHA v MUSHINZIMANA

The court found that Mushinzimana Daniel failed to provide credible medical evidence of cancer or demonstrate that his medical needs could not be met in prison. The court held that no exceptional or compelling reasons were established to justify provisional release.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: RP 00004/2025/CA
Parties: Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Mushinzimana Daniel
Court: Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction: Rwanda
Judgment Date: 11 August 2025
Case Number: RP 00004/2025/CA
Procedural Posture: Criminal / Interlocutory Application for Provisional Release Pending Appeal Review
Outcome: Application for provisional release dismissed
Legal Topics: Provisional Release, Appeal, Exceptional Circumstances, Medical Grounds for Release
Source Language: rw

Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Provisional Release Appeal Exceptional Circumstances Medical Grounds for Release

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Mushinzimana Daniel

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Interlocutory Application for Provisional Release Pending Appeal Review

Legal Issues

1 Whether Mushinzimana Daniel demonstrated exceptional and compelling reasons to justify provisional release pending review of his appeal

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for provisional release dismissed

Orders

The application for provisional release by Mushinzimana Daniel is dismissed as unfounded.
Mushinzimana Daniel shall remain in custody pending the determination of his appeal review case RS/REV/RP 00036/2024/CA.

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.