UBUSHINJACYAHA v MUTABAZI

UBUSHINJACYAHA v MUTABAZI

The appeal was dismissed because the 16-year sentence imposed by the High Court was consistent with the law and the seriousness of the offence. The law, as amended, does not permit further reduction below 15 years, and the circumstances did not justify a lower sentence. The court is not compelled to impose the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00941/2024/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Mutabazi Djamali
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
19 September 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00941/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Mitigating Circumstances, Sexual Offences Against Children, Appeals
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Sentencing Mitigating Circumstances Sexual Offences Against Children Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Mutabazi Djamali

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on Mutabazi Djamali for defilement of a minor could be further reduced on appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the 16-year sentence imposed by the High Court was consistent with the law and the seriousness of the offence. The law, as amended, does not permit further reduction below 15 years, and the circumstances did not justify a lower sentence. The court is not compelled to impose the statutory minimum but must weigh the gravity and impact of the crime.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by Mutabazi Djamali is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The High Court judgment (RPA 00650/2021/HC/RWG) is affirmed in all respects.