MUTIMURA N’UNDI vs EYA NCHAMA UWIMANA

MUTIMURA N’UNDI vs EYA NCHAMA UWIMANA

The urgent application was admissible as it was linked to a substantive appeal; however, there were no urgent grounds to halt construction since the works were advanced and no irreversible harm was shown. Costs and damages cannot be awarded in the urgent application and must be claimed in the substantive proceedings.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCA 00011/2023/CA
Parties
Appellant: Mutimura Benjamin; Appellant: Kazuba Tass; Respondent: Eya Nchama Blondine Uwimana
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
18 October 2023
Case Number
RCA 00011/2023/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal partially allowed
Legal Topics
Urgent Applications, Interlocutory Orders, Land Disputes, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Civil Procedure Property Law Urgent Applications Interlocutory Orders Land Disputes Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mutimura Benjamin

Appellant

Kazuba Tass

Appellant

Eya Nchama Blondine Uwimana

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the urgent application was admissible without a pending substantive claim
  2. 2 Whether there were urgent grounds to halt construction works on disputed land
  3. 3 Whether the respondent was entitled to costs and damages in the urgent application

Ratio Decidendi

The urgent application was admissible as it was linked to a substantive appeal; however, there were no urgent grounds to halt construction since the works were advanced and no irreversible harm was shown. Costs and damages cannot be awarded in the urgent application and must be claimed in the substantive proceedings.

Court Disposition

Appeal partially allowed

Orders

  • Construction works by Mutimura Benjamin and Kazuba Tass may continue on the disputed land.
  • Costs and damages requested by Eya Nchama Blondine Uwimana are denied in the urgent application.