UBUSHINJACYAHA v. NDABARINZE
Appellant had already received mitigation for admitting guilt, as sentence was reduced from statutory minimum of 20 years to 10 years; further mitigation or suspension is not legally available as principal sentence exceeds 5 years and interests of the child do not constitute a legal ground for further reduction.
- Citation
- RPAA0202/10/CS
- Parties
- Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Appellant: Ndabarinze Védaste
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Rwanda
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2014
- Case Number
- RPAA0202/10/CS
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Defilement of a Minor, Mitigating Circumstances, Suspended Sentence
- Source Language
- rw
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ubushinjacyaha
Prosecution
Ndabarinze Védaste
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellant should receive further mitigation of sentence for admitting guilt and seeking forgiveness
- 2 Whether interests of the child born from the crime justify further mitigation or suspension of sentence
- 3 Whether suspended sentence is legally available given the principal sentence imposed
Ratio Decidendi
Appellant had already received mitigation for admitting guilt, as sentence was reduced from statutory minimum of 20 years to 10 years; further mitigation or suspension is not legally available as principal sentence exceeds 5 years and interests of the child do not constitute a legal ground for further reduction.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- No change to prior judgment; appellant to serve 10 years imprisonment
- Court fees to be borne by the State as appellant is incarcerated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment