UBUSHINJACYAHA v NDAGIJE

UBUSHINJACYAHA v NDAGIJE

The written testimony by Mukashema Thaciene was created after the prior judgment and does not meet the legal criteria for new evidence, as it was not in existence or inaccessible during the original proceedings, nor does it contradict the evidence relied upon in the prior judgment. Therefore, the application for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RS/REV/RP 00002/2025/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Ndagije Jean de Dieu
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
30 December 2025
Case Number
RS/REV/RP 00002/2025/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Final Appellate Review
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Revision on New Evidence, Sexual Offences, Child Protection
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Revision on New Evidence Sexual Offences Child Protection

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Ndagije Jean de Dieu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Final Appellate Review

  1. 1 Whether the written testimony of Mukashema Thaciene constitutes new evidence justifying revision of the judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The written testimony by Mukashema Thaciene was created after the prior judgment and does not meet the legal criteria for new evidence, as it was not in existence or inaccessible during the original proceedings, nor does it contradict the evidence relied upon in the prior judgment. Therefore, the application for revision is inadmissible.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for revision is not admitted.
  • The prior judgment in RPAA 00658/2021/CA remains in force.