NDAYAMBAJE N’UNDI v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

NDAYAMBAJE N’UNDI v. UBUSHINJACYAHA

The evidence, including admissions and physical exhibits, established that Nteziyaremye Fidèle engaged in both possession and trafficking of a large quantity of cannabis, justifying the offence classification and sentence. Both appellants already received the minimum sentence permitted by law after mitigation;...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00842/2024/CA
Parties
Appellant: Ndayambaje Ildephonse; Appellant: Nteziyaremye Fidèle; Respondent: Ubushinjacyaha
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
14 November 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00842/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Drug Offences, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Drug Offences Sentencing Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ndayambaje Ildephonse

Appellant

Nteziyaremye Fidèle

Appellant

Ubushinjacyaha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the offence description for Nteziyaremye Fidèle should be changed from trafficking and possession to mere possession of narcotics
  2. 2 Whether the sentences imposed on Ndayambaje Ildephonse and Nteziyaremye Fidèle should be further reduced

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence, including admissions and physical exhibits, established that Nteziyaremye Fidèle engaged in both possession and trafficking of a large quantity of cannabis, justifying the offence classification and sentence. Both appellants already received the minimum sentence permitted by law after mitigation; further reduction is legally impermissible.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal by Ndayambaje Ildephonse and Nteziyaremye Fidèle is dismissed as unfounded.
  • The High Court judgment (RPA 00491/2022/HC/KIG) is affirmed in all respects.